word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 8243 | п- |
2 | 4364 | с- |
3 | 3610 | н- |
4 | 2965 | о- |
5 | 2675 | к- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 3632 | пр- |
2 | 3200 | по- |
3 | 1937 | на- |
4 | 1590 | за- |
5 | 1300 | не- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 1522 | пре- |
2 | 1005 | про- |
3 | 770 | при- |
4 | 579 | нај- |
5 | 469 | пос- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 278 | пред- |
2 | 257 | прет- |
3 | 191 | прес- |
4 | 169 | пост- |
5 | 165 | инте- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 102 | интер- |
2 | 99 | претс- |
3 | 78 | транс- |
4 | 75 | прест- |
5 | 74 | контр- |
The tables show the most frequent letter-N-grams at the beginning of words for N=1…5. Their frequency is count without multiplicity, otherwise the stopwords would dominate the tables.
As shown in the above example (German), word prefixes are clearly visible. In the above example, ver- and ein- are prefixes, and Sch- is not. At the end of a prefix we typically have a wide variety of possible continuations. Hence a prefix of length k will be prominent in the table for N=k, but typically not in the table for N=k+1. The prominent entries Schw- and Schl- for N=4 tell us that Sch- is no prefix.
Zipf’s diagram is plotted with both axis in logarithmic scale, hence we expect nearly straight lines. The graphs look more typical for larger N. Especially for N=3 we find only a small number of trigrams resulting in a sharp decay.
For a language unknown to the reader, the data can easily be used to see whether prefixes do exist and to find the most prominent examples.
For counting, only words with a minimum character length of 10 were considered.
Because only a word list is needed, the tables above can be generated from a relatively small corpus.
For N=3:
SELECT @pos:=(@pos+1), xx.* from (SELECT @pos:=0) r, (select count(*) as cnt, concat(left(word,3),"-") FROM words WHERE w_id>100 group by left(word,3) order by cnt desc) xx limit 5;
For more insight in a language, longer lists might be useful.
Is there a need for larger N
Most frequent word endings
Most frequent letter-N-grams
Number of letter-N-Grams at word beginnings
Number of letter-N-Grams at word endings